English Literature

p 4Comparison Essay Page4 Comparison of Two Plays .Both plays depict various(a) similaritities of themes and manipulation of that theme . Both the plays deal with some scene of sex that was considered taboos by their contemporary societies . Bernard Shaw tries to captivate our attention on the recurrence of prostitution and in addition depicts sub-theme of incest in congenator to postmark and Vivie s relation , while Oscar Wilde treats the theme of homosexuality in the The vastness of Beng earnest . Both the treatment of these subjects of sexuality be not sdubjected to the norms of the indian lodge further according to its historical and socio-economic perspective duality is other important feature of the both plays . The paradoxical and ambivalent feel is the central metaphor in Oscar Wilde s play . This is incarnat ed and delineate by the phenomenon of Bunbury or Bunburying Algernon , the major character in The sizeableness of being Earnest elaborates this terminology of Bunburying as a innovative fantasy exercise that permit to conceal his /her original dis view and flub in activities which society will not aline him in his /her role . This phenomenon is epitomized by the character of Ernest . jackass creates an imaginary twist figure to escape from social liabilities and moral obligation . kindred is the case with Algernon s imaginary friend Bunbury . This kind of deception implies a subtle and profound level of hypocrisy This hypocrisy s also depicted by Bernard Shaw through difference in the characters of Sister Liz and Mrs warren . Sister Liz utilizes the money to work oer bear his reputation and thus held a respectable position in the society . Her reputation is sanctioned by the church building and and then society and her income through the immoral means is canon ical as illegitimate and decent one . As Mrs! cony warren do not this approval and sanctions from church so she is labelled as the most wicked criminal . Bernard Shaw presents other character to take apart the ambivalent and hypocritical constitution of victorian life-style .

Mrs Warren business partner Sir nates Crofts , being an honourable and creditable member of the society and fit out thousands of pounds and earn a fortune 35 as income . Sir Croft is also comparable to Lady Bracknell who epitomizes th titled elite kinsfolk of Victorian era The illustrations of these examples invoke that both Wilde and Shaw consider hypocrisy as the general approach shot of Victorian ex pectation Another similarity between these plays is the eulogium of New Women and aversion from the traditional and conventional women . Vivie in Mrs Warren Profession is a exquisitely example of modern , autarkical women that possess personality traits that are rare in custom-ridden heroines standardized Gwendolen Fairfax and Cecily Cardew of The Importance of Being Ernest . Although Wilde presents these characters in his drama but he does not idealize them but rather make them a target of contempt imputable to their excessive fictitious noble-mindedness The Victorian morality is at a lower place question in both plays . Both Wilde and Shaw make gaming of the ambivalence nature of Victorian morality . For example Jack is of the view that...If you want to get a full essay, modulate it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: che ap essay