Cold war 1989-1991 under Bush's Administration Essay

Cold war 1989-1991 under Bushs Administration - Essay ensampleThe barometer to consider whether or not to intervene was different in each case.The important characteristics of post-Cold War fights were that they did not relate to superpower completion. U.S. interests did not face stark(a) threat, as it was in the Cold War calculus. The strife at far-off places was not of consequence to the national security of U.S. and the vital interests were more or little secure, with no compelling reasons to intervene. There was no confrontation with Soviet Union who was once the dangerous contender for U.S. interests. With the end of the Cold War, trouble fomented at miscellaneous spots leading to a series of events of inter-state aggression. U.S. had no decisive platform to intervene, either political or legal. Its foreign policy was against, interference in the inwrought affairs of others. U.S. could not pursue a policy of isolationist, it needed active political and economic support fro m governments and U.S. was averse to set forth precedents which affected their transaction with other countries. Another important consideration was about adherence to international law governing interventions. Without the correct international legal rationale, any intervention would be termed as an act of self-seeking, with motivated desires and with hidden agenda.Decisions for intervention needed to be taken, explained and defended. The break-up of the Soviet Union was an important development, but no American interests were threatened. Besides, it was an ideological conflict and power-struggle between two factions, both owing allegiance to Communism. Intervention decisions have far-reaching economic implications, besides the need for solid domestic support. In the confusing humanness scenario, with many set of actions taking place simultaneously in different parts of the world, the decision-making process cannot be expected to be orderly and well-structured. That the issue